What is considered unreasonable use of an electrical device?

Using an electrical device, such as a taser or stun gun, on a non-resisting suspect is considered unreasonable because it violates the principle of proportionality in the use of force. Law enforcement is trained to apply force that is appropriate to the situation at hand. A non-resisting suspect does not pose an immediate threat to officers or others; therefore, using an electrical device in such a scenario is excessive and unjustified.

In contrast, employing an electrical device on an actively resisting suspect might be justified as they pose a more significant threat, and similarly, using it against a verbally defiant suspect could also be considered acceptable if there is a likelihood of violence. Using an electrical device in self-defense against an immediate threat is also considered reasonable as it aligns with the necessary response to protect oneself or others. The context of the situation greatly determines the appropriateness of using an electrical device, making it crucial that officers understand the distinction between compliant, non-compliant, and actively resisting subjects.